Verify
Check whether controls are implemented across the intended users, devices, systems and administrators—not merely purchased or partially deployed.
Cyber insurance readiness
NCB Cyber helps organizations review the controls commonly requested during cyber-insurance underwriting, identify gaps and collect evidence that supports accurate responses.
Questions may cover MFA, endpoint detection, email security, backups, privileged access, vulnerability management, incident response and vendor controls. The risk is not simply answering “no.” The bigger problem is answering “yes” when coverage is incomplete or the organization cannot produce evidence showing how the control operates.
Check whether controls are implemented across the intended users, devices, systems and administrators—not merely purchased or partially deployed.
Organize configuration reports, coverage data, policies, procedures and test results so responses can be supported by evidence.
Prioritize gaps that materially affect security and coordinate changes with internal IT, your MSP or NCB Cyber services.
The exact deliverable depends on scope, but a useful review can provide a question-to-control matrix, current-state evidence, gaps, exceptions and a remediation plan. The business and its broker or insurer remain responsible for determining the final wording of application responses.
Security controls often fail at the edges: one administrator is excluded from MFA, a backup job succeeds but restore testing is outdated, EDR misses a group of endpoints, or a former employee retains SaaS access. Those are exactly the conditions a control review is designed to surface.
Review the environment first, document what is true and remediate material weaknesses before renewal or underwriting when possible.
Discuss Cyber Insurance ReadinessCybersecurity risk assessment →
No. NCB Cyber focuses on cybersecurity controls and evidence. Insurance terms, coverage and underwriting decisions belong with the broker and insurer.
No. The purpose of the review is to identify and remediate security gaps and support accurate evidence-based responses. Coverage decisions remain with the insurer.
Yes. Findings can be assigned to the current MSP, internal IT team or another responsible party, and then retested after remediation.